Soil Data Explorer - RED HOOK

Official Series Description

Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the RED HOOK soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of RED HOOK, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to RED HOOK were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot (updated 2020-03-13). Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

There are insufficient data to create the lab data summary figure.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRA	Lab ID	Pedon ID	Taxonname	CI	NSSL / NASIS Reports	Link To SoilWeb GMap
n/a	AB-063	1955-OH007-063	Red hook	2	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	LK-004	1967-OH085-004	Red hook	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a
n/a	LK-027	1970-OH085-027	Red hook	4	Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties	n/a

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the RED HOOK soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the RED HOOK series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot (updated 2024-02-21), parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the RED HOOK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

Geomorphic description summaries for the RED HOOK series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with RED HOOK share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records (updated 2023-10-02) and snapshot of the SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Select annual climate data summaries for the RED HOOK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data (updated 2023-10-09).

There are insufficient data to create the annual climate figure.

Geomorphic description summaries for the RED HOOK series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records (updated 2023-10-04).

There are insufficient data to create the 2D hillslope position figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D hills figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D mountains figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D terrace figure.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with RED HOOK, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database (updated 2023-10-02).

Block Diagrams

Click a link below to display the diagram. Note that these diagrams may be from multiple survey areas.

1. NY-2010-09-28-14 | Otsego County - 2006

   Relationships between landscape and parent material for selected soils in Otsego County (Soil Survey of Otsego County, New York; 2006).

2. NY-2010-09-28-19 | Otsego County - 2006

   Typical pattern of soils and underlying material in the Wellsboro-Oquaga-Lackawanna general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Otsego County, New York; 2006).

3. NY-2012-02-15-46 | Sullivan County - July 1989

   Typical landscape pattern of the soils and the underlying material in the Wellsboro-Oquaga-Lackawanna general soil map unit (Soil Survey of Sullivan County, New York; July 1989).

4. NY-2012-02-16-05 | Wyoming County - April 1974

   Typical pattern of soils in association 11 (Soil Survey of Wyoming County, New York; April 1974).

Map Units

Map units containing RED HOOK as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name	Symbol	Map Unit Area (ac)	Map Unit Key	National Map Unit Symbol	Soil Survey Area	Publication Date	Map Scale
Red Hook and Atherton silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	RaA	5348	301872	b43t	me607	1960	1:20000
Red Hook and Atherton silt loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes	RaB	3046	301873	b43v	me607	1960	1:20000
Red Hook and Atherton silt loams, 2 to 8 percent slopes	RaB	2270	614206	nm43	me608	1962	1:20000
Red Hook and Atherton silt loams, 0 to 2 percent slopes	RaA	968	614205	nm42	me608	1962	1:20000
Red Hook and Atherton silt loams, 0 to 8 percent slopes	RaB	16833	285255	9kts	me614	1960	1:20000
Red Hook and Atherton fine sandy loams, 0 to 8 percent slopes	RdB	11273	285256	9ktt	me614	1960	1:20000
Red Hook silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	46A	1195	299885	b21q	ny003	2013	1:24000
Red Hook gravelly silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	49A	483	1859990	20fgp	ny003	2013	1:24000
Red Hook silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	46B	216	318197	bp3f	ny003	2013	1:24000
Red Hook silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	49A	3204	289613	9qcc	ny009	2002	1:24000
Red Hook silt loam	Rh	8481	289869	9qmm	ny013	1988	1:15840
Red Hook silt loam	Re	920	290032	9qsw	ny017	1982	1:15840
Red Hook silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	46A	244	2723093	2rwcg	ny023	2014	1:12000
Red Hook gravelly silt loam	Re	919	290547	9rbh	ny025	1999	1:24000
Red Hook silt loam	Re	5181	290886	9rpf	ny029	1979	1:15840
Red Hook silt loam	Re	2317	294278	9w6v	ny077	1993	1:24000
Red Hook gravelly silt loam	Rh	188	294543	9whd	ny095	1965	1:15840
Red Hook gravelly silt loam	Rh	790	294643	9wlm	ny097	1976	1:15840
Red Hook silt loam	Rh	2525	294851	9wtb	ny101	1972	1:15840
Red Hook sandy loam	Re	1474	295118	9x2y	ny105	1984	1:15840
Braceville gravelly silt loam	Bg	1287	295802	9xt0	ny107	1947	1:31680
Red Hook gravelly silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes	RhA	117	295677	9xnz	ny109	1963	1:20000
Red Hook gravelly silt loam	Re	2574	295527	9xj4	ny111	1974	1:15840
Red Hook gravelly loam	Rh	2369	295421	9xdq	ny121	1969	1:20000
Red Hook silt loam	Re	333	289323	9q20	ny605	1981	1:24000
Red Hook silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	RhB	2939	298916	b11g	oh007	2001	1:12000
Red Hook silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	RhA	2642	298915	b11f	oh007	2001	1:12000
Red Hook sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	RhA	6470	286840	9mgx	oh085	1976	1:15840
Red Hook silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes	RkB	3	286859	9mhj	oh085	1976	1:15840
Red Hook silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes	RhA	84	287154	9mt1	oh155	1986	1:15840
Red Hook loam	Rh	23841	296189	9y6h	pa039	1973	1:20000
Red Hook silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes	RhB	15411	2633056	2rg70	pa049	2012	1:12000
Red Hook silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes	RhA	6341	2633055	2rg6z	pa049	2012	1:12000
Urban land-Red Hook complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes	UrA	793	2633093	2rg86	pa049	2012	1:12000
Red Hook silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes, moderately eroded	RoB2	8733	296257	9y8p	pa085	1967	1:20000
Red Hook silt loam, flooded	Rf	1380	296255	9y8m	pa085	1967	1:20000
Red Hook silt loam, low terrace	Rh	847	296256	9y8n	pa085	1967	1:20000
Red Hook silt loam	Rh	1452	1948853	23dy7	pa095	2007	1:12000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the RED HOOK soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry (updated 2023-10-04).